<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheap bokeh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pauljoy.com/2010/02/cheap-bokeh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pauljoy.com/2010/02/cheap-bokeh/</link>
	<description>Filmmaker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:18:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Joy</title>
		<link>http://www.pauljoy.com/2010/02/cheap-bokeh/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pauljoy.com/?p=2715#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Hi Robert, it&#039;s funny you mention Wallander as I&#039;ve mentioned to other people how wonderful the photography is in it. It&#039;s shot on the Red One I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert, it&#8217;s funny you mention Wallander as I&#8217;ve mentioned to other people how wonderful the photography is in it. It&#8217;s shot on the Red One I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.pauljoy.com/2010/02/cheap-bokeh/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pauljoy.com/?p=2715#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul, I read Simon&#039;s &#039;Bokeh Porn&#039; rant and have to say  it sounds pretty pointless. The rather bitter sounding disregard he has for video DSLR users and there lack of narrative seems blinkered and hopelessly negative. Come on simon knock that chip of your shoulder.

Did you see a drama series earlier this year called &#039;Wallander&#039; staring Kenneth Branagh. If you didn&#039;t its well worth checking out if you can, the cinematography is beautiful, it uses shallow depth of field in nearly every shot as a visual esthetic. I haven&#039;t seen a TV series shot like this before. Made me wonder what camera/s they used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul, I read Simon&#8217;s &#8216;Bokeh Porn&#8217; rant and have to say  it sounds pretty pointless. The rather bitter sounding disregard he has for video DSLR users and there lack of narrative seems blinkered and hopelessly negative. Come on simon knock that chip of your shoulder.</p>
<p>Did you see a drama series earlier this year called &#8216;Wallander&#8217; staring Kenneth Branagh. If you didn&#8217;t its well worth checking out if you can, the cinematography is beautiful, it uses shallow depth of field in nearly every shot as a visual esthetic. I haven&#8217;t seen a TV series shot like this before. Made me wonder what camera/s they used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurent</title>
		<link>http://www.pauljoy.com/2010/02/cheap-bokeh/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>laurent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pauljoy.com/?p=2715#comment-272</guid>
		<description>what about kit 35 on a EX1 ?
you get the DOF while still using your camcorder benefits (rushes with some space for grading... )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about kit 35 on a EX1 ?<br />
you get the DOF while still using your camcorder benefits (rushes with some space for grading&#8230; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

